Related PDF

Sustaining digital leadership - EY
Sustaining digital leadership 3 Welcome toSustaining digital leadership the second volume of our
Building and Sustaining an Oficer Wellness Program
This project was supported in whole or in part by cooperative agreement number 2016 CK WXK 030
A S General Assembly Distr.: General Security Council
A 72 707 S 2018 43 4 19 18 00829 further opportunities to enhance links at the intergovernmental level in
How Useful Is the Theory of Disruptive Innovation?
FALL 2015 Andrew A King Baljir Baatartogtokh How Useful Is the Theory of Disruptive
The Importance of Role-Taking Opportunities for Self
The Importance of Role Taking Opportunities for Self Sustaining Moral Development1 Georg Lind University of Konstanz
6. Sustaining peace and sustainable development in
SIPRI Yearbook 2017 Armaments isarmament and International Security www sipriyearbook org 6 Sustaining peace and sustainable
susTAining -
February 22 24 2019 Louisville KY AACTE 71st Annual Meeting susTAining ADVAnCing PROFEssiOn and the
Sustaining quality growth - KPMG | DE
Contents Introduction 12th Five Year Plan Roads Railways Metro and light rail Ports Airports Water
Peacebuilding 1 Sustaining Peace What does sustaining
sustaining peace The when Peacebuilding is no longer
The Challenge of Sustaining Peace : The Report on the
The Challenge of Sustaining Peace The Report on
Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage - GBV
Fourth Edition Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage Jay B Barney The Ohio State University
Sustaining Wildlands -
Sustaining Wildlands Poe Aaron J Gimblett Randy Published by University of Arizona Press Poe
Security Technology Vision 2017 The self sustaining enterprise 3 As the risks within the

Popular PDF


Security Technology Vision 2017 The self sustaining enterprise 3 As the risks within the ecosystem change the infrastructure will need the agility to shift security postures

Insert your error message here, if the PDF cannot be displayed.

File type: PDF

File size: 103 B

File name: Accenture-The-Self-Sustaining-Enterprise.pdf

Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise  | 
One way to think about this 
is in the context of your own 
neighborhood. How do you 
understand and navigate your 
relationships? Some neighbors 
you know well, others are 
strangers. Visitors, deliveries, 
workers, commuters all come and 
go, creating an environment where 
you must be aware of the dierent 
risks that each visitor poses. 
Who can you trust? This is the 
precise question that businesses 
need to answer as the population 
of their own neighborhood—the 
digital ecosystem—dynamically 
changes and grows. 
To navigate ecosystem 
relationships, it is important for 
companies to know their business 
processes well. They need to 
understand what is valuable to 
the business and the required 
operational resilience or, using 
the neighborhood analogy: 
“What’s in our house and how 
well have we protected or 
fortiied our key assets?” As new 
challenges or opportunities arise, 
companies may choose to make 
selected processes more resilient 
while maintaining or optimally 
decreasing the level of risk.
Businesses operate in a digital ecosystem that is becoming 
ever more connected, collaborative and complex.
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise  | 
As the risks within the ecosystem 
change, the infrastructure will need 
the agility to shift security postures 
in response. If a stranger shows 
up in your neighborhood, how do 
you respond? Do you question 
the stranger to establish who they 
are? Do you turn out the lights and 
pretend you are not at home? Or 
do you move your valuables to a 
hidden location?
Similarly, an organization will 
need to develop an ability to 
rapidly address and assimilate 
strangers—both people and 
devices—into the business 
ecosystem. It will also need new 
agility to sense and respond to 
threats and vulnerabilities as they 
present themselves. These are the 
characteristics of what we call “the 
self-sustaining enterprise.”
In such a complex, rapidly changing 
environment, being self-sustaining 
is only made possible if decisions 
are made at machine speed. 
Machines provide the predictive 
analytics and cognitive modeling 
that automate how enterprise 
security “thinks” about threats or 
risks. Infrastructure paradigms, such 
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
The deep symbiosis between people and technology 
creates new and heightened security risks. As the 
connectedness of physical and digital worlds increases, 
so does the attack surface.
The attack surface for all organizations is 
expanding exponentially. By 2020 Cisco 
estimates that there will be in the region of 
50 billion connected devices online,
thermostats, cars, locks and itness monitors 
to manufacturing equipment, supply chain 
infrastructures, aircraft, power grids and 
public transport. Everything that can be 
connected, will be.
This proliferation of connected devices is 
taking place with little guidance or standards. 
Eorts to embed security measures have 
been largely left to the manufacturers and 
they, as yet, have no real incentive, economic 
or otherwise, to do so. The imperative to 
be irst to market and maximize ease of use 
eclipses all other considerations. Even in the 
critical area of medical devices, the Food 
and Drug Administration has only just issued 
recommendations (December 2016) for medical 
manufacturers to provide post-market risk 
management—emphasizing that manufacturers 
should monitor, identify, and address 
cybersecurity vulnerabilities as part of their 
post-market management of medical devices. 
The trend to “bring your own device” will 
only gain momentum as people expand 
their personal connectedness with the many 
devices they bond with or are indentured to. 
The business is also increasingly stretching 
traditional enterprise boundaries through the 
distributed, liquid workforce where workers 
operate in dierent places and contexts (many 
of them lying beyond a business’s traditionally 
highly patrolled perimeter). As services extend 
to these workers, interactions and disruptions 
can be expected from other devices in their 
ecosystem: smart home devices are just one 
example. Collectively, these developments 
create a multidimensional surface for 
interaction, communications, and attack 
and/or exploitation. 
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
The malware known as “Mirai” was responsible for the massive 
distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack on Dyn’s domain name 
system in October 2016 (in which reported attack rates were as 
high as 1.2 Tbps
). This impeded access to a range of some of the 
Internet’s biggest names in parts of the United States. 
Mirai takes advantage of vulnerabilities in Internet of Things (IoT) connected 
devices, continuously scanning for ones that are protected only by factory 
default or hard-coded usernames/passwords.
And it is worth noting that 
far from being a one-off attack, Mirai’s source code has been posted online, 
making it available to an army of new attackers. It is mutating faster than you 
can read these words and, in view of these developments, it is perhaps no 
coincidence that Mirai means “future” in Japanese.
So how are well-funded and sophisticated 
attackers exploiting this fertile terrain? The 
stark truth: they are turning apparently benign 
devices into weapons capable of causing 
massive harm to corporations, industries, and 
even nation states.
In a connected digital world, the risk resides 
both in the devices themselves, and in the 
cloud services to which they send their data. 
In a worst-case scenario, compromising those 
cloud services could cede to an attacker 
centralized command and control over a 
huge number of devices. 
The scale and frequency of the attacks we 
are seeing today are likely just the irst lurries 
before the storm (see above). Cyber-attacks 
taking advantage of the proliferation of 
unsecured devices (not to mention the growing 
ecosystem of identities, applications, data and 
networks) are growing in sophistication and 
reach every day. And as this happens, the onus 
is on organizations to develop a very dierent 
mind-set and approach to security—one in 
which trust becomes critical.
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
In a self-sustaining enterprise, it is imperative to know what is 
important for the business to function to take the appropriate 
actions regarding the level of security and protection that 
speciic assets require.
Today, this assessment relies on human-
intensive and error-prone data collection, with 
employees having to attest to what devices 
or assets are, and how they are used. As it 
describes just one moment in time, this data 
must be constantly updated to keep pace with 
changes in the business and how it functions. 
In the new business ecosystem, organizations 
will need capabilities that discover and 
analytically classify the role of an asset in a 
continuous manner. Once understood, the 
business will need to agree and establish 
an acceptable risk which then informs the 
level of trust required for every asset—user, 
device and data element. Organizations will 
shape security controls based on the degree 
of trust for assets, and deploy trust-based 
authentication mechanisms that assign 
each device a “trust level” that guides the 
requirements needed for access.
Similarly, each business process needs to 
be understood in terms of the technical 
infrastructure—the neighborhood of assets 
that work together to implement it. The 
process’s business value and sensitivity 
will drive the requirements for control 
and protection, deining the risk level of 
the neighborhood. Processes with similar 
requirements could be aggregated into these 
neighborhoods which can then  
be uniformly managed with a common set 
of controls and protections—an adaptive, 
intelligent security platform—to streamline 
security operations and reduce complexity.
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
The identity that it proclaims through attestation
he degree of control an enterprise has over the device 
(including corporate, third-party, personal and smart building/
Factors that help to measure trust such as:
xposure to unknown devices (if an unknown device is added to a 
neighborhood, it may be used to attack other devices, reducing trust 
xposure of the device to vulnerabilities: is it something the enterprise 
can patch? If not, the device needs to be categorized with a lower degree 
of trust.
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
Enterprise security needs to leverage Artiicial Intelligence 
(AI) and new infrastructure paradigms to keep pace with 
changing attack surfaces.
This means having: 
n operating model that provides an in-depth 
understanding of the risk from devices and 
vulnerabilities within the environment, their 
potential impact on business processes, 
along with the agility to mitigate identiied 
risks quickly
ersistent identity and the capability to 
analytically identify assets and their role and 
ecurity embedded into how the enterprise 
works, transparently guiding the business to 
behave securely
he lexibility needed to dynamically 
segment and enforce behaviors and policy 
throughout the infrastructure.
So what actions can organizations take to 
achieve a self-sustaining security platform?
In practice, identity is largely dependent on 
knowledge, membership or relationships. 
Roles and functions are deined based on the 
repository of knowledge. The self-sustaining 
enterprise will require more sophisticated 
identity methods to keep pace with the ability 
to manage persistent identity. 
Persistent identity, assurance that actions 
are indeed the authorized user’s and not 
someone using a phished account, are 
fundamental to the model. There are 
now many persistent identity solutions, 
including DARPA’s Active Authentication 
behavioral biometrics challenge—based 
on unobservable human biometrics. The 
“RUU” solution by Accenture Labs and Allure 
Security Technology demonstrated high 
idelity through a small client footprint. 
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
Identity and Access Management (IAM) 
services must also keep up with the speed 
of business. IAM value realization is often 
impeded by too many choke points. As the 
number of applications and systems grow, the 
manual workforce and corresponding eort 
grows with it, leading to a less eective and 
more error prone process. To realize the value 
of IAM investments, leading organizations 
are moving to Robotics Process Automation 
(RPA) to orchestrate the very structured and 
repetitive tasks. RPA closes the eiciency 
gap that is created by an antiquated reliance 
on manual processes. Accenture is bringing 
robotics to life by connecting isolated 
applications in a holistic automation capability.
Leading businesses are looking closely at the 
serverless opportunity. Grown from cloud 
thinking, serverless is a more far-reaching 
computing approach that changes how the 
business creates and manages applications.
Serverless refers to a new paradigm of building 
applications where the business focuses more 
on its business application functions and less 
on the processing and hardware needed to 
run these functions. The operational aspects 
of managing applications, such as maintaining 
servers, scaling and deploying are managed by 
a third-party vendor. 
In a serverless architecture, applications are 
deconstructed into microservices that run and 
auto-scale dynamically. This lowers cost to the 
business and enables a rapid development 
cycle. Huge applications with static code and 
container-based applications are replaced 
with individual functions that are only run 
on demand. Certain common functions, like 
authentication, are provided, updated and 
maintained by the vendor. Businesses must 
continue to write secure code, but they can 
leave the deployment and running of the 
functions to the trusted vendor. Providers like 
Amazon Web Services,
 Lambda or Apache 
 motivated to provide high quality 
services, manage the underlying security of 
the servers and the data.
Moving applications to a serverless model 
requires a high level of operational maturity. 
The business must be able to deconstruct 
applications into microservices and events and 
be clear on access controls, data protection and 
expected behaviors. Additionally, the business 
must deine the data needs and choreography 
of the events and communications (the 
data low between each function). Once the 
expected choreography and behaviors have 
been articulated, the enterprise can focus on 
behavior: leveraging artiicial intelligence to 
monitor, model and learn granular application 
behavior. The behavioral ingerprint will enable it 
to identify and even anticipate potential threats 
to the business. 
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
For infrastructure that remains in the enterprise, 
controls should be designed independently 
of the physical infrastructure. By abstracting 
security in this way, the business can leverage 
virtualization to eiciently deliver the required 
security to assets. Software-deined security 
provides the lexibility and agility needed 
to control and quarantine small parts of 
the network/device, taking advantage of 
micro-segmentation and enabling the self-
sustaining enterprise. In combination with 
an orchestration engine like Service Now, 
businesses can be responsive to changing 
risk conditions, with the ability to move in 
and out of environments, while ensuring a 
consistent level of security control is in place. 
More specialized security orchestration can be 
delivered through solutions like Phantom,
create a foundation on which to layer cognitive 
modeling to enhance security decisions.
With a software-deined security approach, an 
asset can attest to its role and function within 
the enterprise, orchestrated security services 
validate that attestation and assign a degree 
of trust, and security functions are delivered 
and calibrated to the asset’s role and perceived 
risks. This automatic ability to continuously 
shape the security environment is, in large part, 
what enables the self-sustaining enterprise.
Think again about the neighborhood: 
in a heavily virtualized environment an 
organization would be able to dynamically 
provision access to the neighborhood, as 
well as dynamically assign new housing to it. 
As new compute assets become available, 
the organization could rapidly engage with 
the assets that best support its business 
functions. Business processes with similar 
risk could be grouped into subdivisions 
to better enforce controls and behavior, 
enabling more eective management of risks.
As threats or risks change, the self-sustaining 
enterprise would use this same approach 
to dynamically segment network traic or 
resources to manage business risk or contain 
an incident. Tempered Networks
 has moved 
forward with a solution that takes advantage of 
orchestration to enable fast provisioning and de-
provisioning of networks. With security in mind, 
it leverages this to instantly segment, protect, 
cloak, failover or revoke any device or resource 
on the network. Dynamic segmentation and 
micro-segmentation capabilities enable the 
security organization to respond to threats, 
adapting protections to maintain the agreed-
upon risk posture with the business.
Another dynamic technique to manage threats 
and vulnerabilities is to shapeshift or morph, 
making the target invisible or continuously 
incomprehensible to the attacker. For high 
business value assets or services, a polymorphic 
approach could be used (see page 13). 
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
In a “polymorphic model”, resources and technologies dynamically 
evolve based on a developing understanding of both the threats to 
which they may be vulnerable and the degree to which they may 
be trusted. Where needed, additional polymorphic controls can be 
layered onto high-risk devices to make the attack surface even more 
dynamic, protecting it from targeted attacks. In our model de�nition, 
serverless and software-de�ned networking, when applied 
dynamically to actively manage risk under changing conditions, 
could be considered elements of a polymorphic security model.
In these models, it is possible to change —
morph—the targeted assets to reduce the 
eectiveness of an attack, or eliminate the 
viability of any critical vulnerability. Morphisec
uses a polymorphic approach to protect 
applications as they process in-memory. As 
an application, Web browser or OS loads to 
the memory space, a polymorphic engine 
scrambles the inner structure of the process, its 
calls to library functions and library addresses, 
making the memory unpredictable to attackers.
As business ecosystems continue to extend 
and intermesh, business assets will be exposed 
to new threats. To eectively manage these 
risks, organizations need an operating model 
that leverages all the capabilities described. 
Together, these enable the self-sustaining 
enterprise to rapidly identify devices, 
understand the threats that they pose to the 
organization, and shift the security posture of 
the organization to quickly mitigate the impact 
of any vulnerability or exposure. 
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise  | 
Successful businesses will enable connectivity and 
collaboration through self-sustaining practices. To operate 
at digital speed and with agility, security must move at the 
same machine speeds. With a self-sustaining approach, 
existing cybersecurity capabilities are enhanced through 
automation, machine learning, software-deined networking 
and new approaches to infrastructure to maximize resilience 
and support swift recovery from any disruption.
In doing so, organizations can be safe in their neighborhood. 
They can know who is in the neighborhood and collaborate 
when and where it makes sense. And, the best part, 
they have the agility to change—to meet new business 
opportunities and safely navigate when conditions are 
unfavorable or threats arise.
Understand the availability and sustainability goals 
for key business processes based on an acceptable 
level of risk to the organization.
Consider how these security services could  
be shared
for reuse and consistency. Evaluate 
how they could be more eectively applied to 
the microservices and events. Revisit the security 
requirements for business functions and services. 
Identify security functions
that can be provided 
as a virtual service through serverless and network 
virtualized functions of software-deined networking.
Build a robust identity and access management 
that can detect and manage both new and 
existing assets—including users, devices, data and 
communications—to dynamically and continuously 
determine how trusted they are. 
ntegrate products and/or techniques that will “think” 
and “react” 
with minimal human eort—like artiicial 
intelligence and advanced analytics—to enable the self-
sustaining environment.
Identify the applications that could be logically 
from their operational components 
into microservices and events.
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise | 
Security Technology Vision 2017: The self-sustaining enterprise  |